Two Sides of the Penalty of Death

For the first issue on the blog I will have the debate of a politics issue that happens in the United States of America and maybe in a few primitive countries like in Iran and the Republic of the Texas. Each time I use the blog I will talk about the issue and present two sides of the issue because I see things from two sides. Then I will make the judge about the side I pick but you may not agree with me and I hope you do not find it to be something that makes you angry. I do not have the bias for political beliefs. Thank you for stopping by.

Issue

Should the penalty of death happen when a person murders the other person.

Stuff you should know

I used the Google.com to find some information about the topic of this to give the facts to you without any judge or opinions. There are some important facts you must know about this issue that you may not know if you are not following this or if you do not come from the country with the penalty of death.

• Not all of the United States of America have the penalty of death for the people who do the murders because some states do not have this but 34 states and the Republic of Texas territory do have this.
• 56% of people turn white after the penalty of death but sometimes the skin turns black in 35% of the time.
• The district attorneys who like to use the penalty of death are almost always the white men.
• Not all of those who have the penalty of death did the crime at all and sometimes they get saved by people who think they are innocent like these people.
• Some of the people who get the penalty of death said some bad things about the United States of America so the country kill them for this mean talk.
• Some of the people who get the penalty of death did some sex with the killing of another.
• Some of the people who get the penalty of death were mean to child or to elderly person.
• In some countries like Iran and maybe in the Republic of Texas you can get the penalty of death not for murdering but for being the boy liking the boy or the girl liking the girl.
• The people who have a retardation in the brain cannot be put to the penalty of death.
  

One side

One side of this says that the penalty of death is a good thing. This side of things is the side that some people take like some political people and some people at churches and some people who have talk shows on the radio. This side of things is that when someone does a bad thing maybe if they get the penalty of death they will not be able to do the bad thing again. Maybe they will be dead and it will then be hardest to do same crime two times. The people on this side of things say that when you use the penalty of death people who do the bad crimes will not do the crimes again. I can see this side of things because when you do a bad thing we want you dead so you cannot do that again.

Maybe the cages in the country of the United States of America are crowded. Some say this is because of the laws about the drugs in the United States of America. Maybe the cages in the Republic of Texas have crowds also. Texas is only place that can fly the flag as high as the flag of the United States of America and this is why they are special country that have their own killing of the prisoners. If the cages are crowded then the penalty of death is one good way to get the people out of the cages so more can come into them. This seems like a very good idea to clean the cages and I can see this side of things.

What about using the penalty of death to tell the others of society that if you do the bad thing you will die. If you kill the person you may get the penalty of death so do not kill the person. This side of things is like a big red light of warning to the person who wants to do the bad thing like rapage or saying something bad about the United States of America. When one person does this and has the penalty of death it makes the others think four times before doing the death or makes them be more careful about how they do it so they do not get put in a cage before then having the needle in the arm.

The penalty of death uses the needle in the arm and then you just fall asleep like with zither music playing in background except just in the head. I do not know how this might feel but when they ask the dead people if it hurt they do not give the answer. So if they do not give the answer how do we know if this hurts or this does not hurt? This is the one side.

Other side

The other side of things says that it is not good to have the penalty of death. One reason is because penalty of death is very expensive. I see this with something I read that it says that when you give someone the penalty of death then they get to have another time in the courthouse to say that they do not want to have death. They have to pay the attorney and the typewriter person and the judges and sometimes have to travel to the Supreme Court of the United States of America building to have the case to judge. This costs lots of money and if the prisoner got life in a cage it would not cost so much. Life in cage would mean no more crime like death would because if you are in the cage all life then you do not have the chance to kill another person.

The other side of this is that some say that the penalty of death is unfair to people who fly from Africa to the United States of America. These African United States of Americans get the penalty of death at a high number when you compare to how many of them live in urban city places. Also it is not fair to the people when you cannot have the penalty of death if you are retarded or if you are not old enough to vote for the penalty of death. This means that some people will have the penatly of death because they are smart and old and that does not seem fair.

I do not know if I like the government of Iran or of the United States of America or of the Republic of Texas killing the people because what if they did not do the crime? When I did the research on the Google.com I saw that sometimes people have the penalty of death because Mr. District Attorney Man make a wrong decision and the twelve people who want to be the judge of this do not see both sides and only one side and make the wrong decision. If they do not want to see both sides then I do not think the penatly of death would be a good thing because you have to see both sides when making a judge.

The judge

In the conclusion, I think that penalty of death has two sides and we should look at two sides when we make the judge about this issue. Maybe the best thing to do is to make sure cages are clean of lots of people not by doing the killing but by keeping people from being there in the firsts place. This is easy to do if you think of both sides of the issue. One side is to not put people in the cages for little stuff like the drugs. If you do this then the cages are not full and we do not have to use the penalty of death. The other issue is to always bring a passport if you go to the Republic of Texas and understand if you do something bad there and are not a white person you may have the penatly of death. Please be careful there and call your country embassy to find out if it safe for you to travel there.

Do you think this is good decision? I do. Thank you for reading the blog number 1.